Chakraborty’s legal team asserts that Ghosh’s accusations have caused irreparable harm to the actor’s personal and professional reputation. The suit specifically refers to Ghosh’s allegations that Chakraborty was involved in several high-profile financial scandals, including the notorious Alchemist Group money laundering case, the Rose Valley Financial Scandal, and the Saradha Chit Fund Scandal. According to Chakraborty’s lawyers, these accusations are entirely unfounded and have been made with malicious intent, driven by political animosity.
In addition to the financial allegations, the defamation suit also highlights Ghosh’s claims about Chakraborty’s family. Ghosh reportedly accused Chakraborty’s son of being involved in a rape case, an allegation Chakraborty vehemently denies. Furthermore, the TMC spokesperson allegedly made remarks about Chakraborty’s wife, suggesting her involvement in dubious financial transactions. These comments, Chakraborty argues, were designed to tarnish his family’s reputation and harm their social standing.
The actor-turned-politician, who is also a recipient of the Padma Bhushan and Dadasaheb Phalke Lifetime Achievement Award, claims that the defamatory remarks have not only affected his personal life but have also jeopardized his career in films and advertising. He is now seeking legal redress in a bid to restore his and his family’s honor and to hold Ghosh accountable for the damage caused by his statements.
In a sharp counteraction, Kunal Ghosh has also taken legal steps, filing a criminal defamation suit against Mithun Chakraborty. Ghosh expressed his readiness to face the legal proceedings and indicated that he would seek a CBI investigation into the allegations he made against the actor. He further stated that he had already filed his own defamation suit against Chakraborty in the Bankshall Court, claiming that the actor had made defamatory remarks about him. Ghosh has also challenged Chakraborty’s claims, pointing out the actor’s history of political affiliations — from his early involvement with the Naxalite movement to his later affiliations with Shiv Sena, TMC, and now BJP. Ghosh argues that Chakraborty’s frequent changes in political allegiance raise questions about his credibility.
The situation has become a highly charged political and legal standoff, with both parties using the courtroom as a platform for their broader political battles. Ghosh’s remarks about Chakraborty’s political career — including accusations that the actor switched parties to avoid investigation — have only fueled the fire. Ghosh, who has been vocal about his criticism of Chakraborty’s political moves, emphasized that he was “waiting for this situation” to present documents related to the chit fund cases in court, and insisted that the CBI should investigate the matter further.
While the legal battle intensifies, it remains to be seen how the courts will rule on the defamation suits. The legal proceedings, which have been marked by intense public scrutiny, have yet to announce a hearing date, although sources suggest that the case may be brought before the court as early as next week.
This high-profile defamation dispute underscores the ongoing rivalry between two prominent political figures in West Bengal and highlights the complex interplay between politics and personal reputations in the state. It also sheds light on the intricacies of political discourse, where personal attacks and legal confrontations often spill over into public view, creating dramatic spectacles that resonate with the public and media alike.
As the case develops, the people of Bengal, and indeed the entire nation, will be watching closely to see how this legal drama unfolds in the courts.
In a video message shared on social media, Agnihotri, best known for his previous works The Tashkent Files (2019) and The Kashmir Files (2022), called upon the Chief Minister to uphold the principles of freedom of speech and ensure that The Bengal Files is shown in cinemas across the state.
Agnihotri claimed that theatre owners in West Bengal were being threatened by TMC workers, resulting in uncertainty about whether the film would be allowed to be released as scheduled this Friday. In his emotional appeal, the filmmaker reminded Banerjee of her oath to protect the constitutional rights of every citizen, including the freedom to express opinions through cinema. “You have taken an oath on the Indian Constitution to protect free speech,” Agnihotri stated, adding that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) had already cleared the film for release.
The film is the third and final instalment in Agnihotri’s ‘Files’ trilogy and explores the communal violence of 1946, a subject that remains contentious in the state’s political climate. While Agnihotri argued that reopening old wounds through cinema is essential for historical awareness, he also noted that other historical tragedies, such as the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings, are taught to children worldwide. He questioned why the new generation should not be made aware of this critical chapter in Bengal’s and India’s history.
“The true spirit of Bengal will not allow this movie to be banned,” Agnihotri asserted, emphasizing the film’s importance in fostering national dialogue. He further criticized the opposition to the film, pointing out the inconsistencies in how selective historical events are portrayed or suppressed.
The controversy surrounding The Bengal Files intensified earlier this month when the film’s trailer launch in Kolkata was physically stopped by protestors. Agnihotri described this as an attack on the freedom of expression and called on the state government to ensure that no further disruptions take place.
However, in a reaction to Agnihotri’s video, Trinamool Congress leader Kunal Ghosh dismissed the filmmaker’s claims of political interference, stating that the decision to restrict the screening of the film was made by theatre owners independently. Ghosh accused Agnihotri of attempting to provoke conflict under the guise of filmmaking, pointing out that there was no political pressure involved.
Ghosh also criticized Agnihotri’s selective conscience, citing his silence over other incidents such as the Godhra riots and the ongoing violence in Manipur. “Where was Vivek Agnihotri’s conscience when Gujarat was burning or when Manipur was suffering? His conscience only awakens when it suits his narrative,” Ghosh remarked.
Amidst these tensions, The Bengal Files also faces delays in its international release, particularly in Mauritius, where it has not yet received the necessary clearance from the local censor board. The film is also undergoing review in regions like the UAE, Singapore, Malaysia, and Hong Kong, which have stringent content approval processes for films dealing with politically sensitive themes.
As the film’s release date approaches, all eyes are now on how the political and social pressures in Bengal will influence its screening and reception across the country.
The notification gives expanded powers to the Foreigners Tribunal, allowing it to send any suspected illegal foreigner to a detention center, even if they claim to be Indian citizens. In such cases, the individual will not be allowed to present evidence or seek bail, and their detention will continue until the deportation process is complete.
The order also places a significant focus on Bangladeshi infiltrators, with operations already underway in several states to apprehend and expel individuals suspected of entering India illegally. However, these moves have sparked protests, particularly from political parties like the Trinamool Congress (TMC), which alleges that the new guidelines unfairly target Bengali-speaking people, accusing them of being disproportionately detained and pushed back to Bangladesh based solely on their language and ethnicity.
As part of the enforcement measures, the Union Home Ministry has directed all states and union territories to establish designated detention centers for undocumented immigrants. The new regulations require that foreign nationals provide biometric data when applying for an Indian visa, and impose restrictions on foreigners involved in serious criminal activities, including terrorism, human trafficking, and drug offenses.
The ministry’s order also tightens restrictions on foreign nationals in India. They are now required to obtain written permission from the government for activities like media production, mountaineering expeditions, and accessing restricted areas. Moreover, individuals from Afghanistan, China, and Pakistan are prohibited from visiting certain sensitive regions, including parts of Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland, and other border states.
In a move to ensure tighter control over foreign nationals, the Home Ministry has also stated that individuals may be barred from leaving the country if they are under investigation, suffering from diseases that pose a public health risk, or if their departure could harm international relations. A new list will be maintained by the Bureau of Immigration to track foreign nationals who have been denied entry or permission to leave India.
The notification has sparked a heated political debate. While the BJP justifies the move as necessary to protect India’s borders, opposition parties, particularly in states like West Bengal, have criticized the policy as discriminatory. The TMC has accused the ruling party of using the issue of illegal immigration as a tool to target linguistic and ethnic minorities, claiming that it disproportionately affects the Bengali-speaking population.
As the Immigration and Foreigners Act begins to take effect, tensions are expected to escalate between the Centre and opposition-led state governments, particularly in regions where large numbers of Bengali speakers reside. The future of India’s immigration policy remains uncertain, as the government’s strict stance on undocumented immigrants continues to stir both support and opposition across the political spectrum.
The incident in question took place last Saturday when Singh and his supporters allegedly vandalized the Congress office in Moulali, Kolkata. Reports indicate that they smeared black ink on a picture of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, tore banners, and raised slogans in protest against remarks allegedly made about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s late mother during Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Voter Adhikar Yatra’ in Bihar. The protest quickly escalated into a confrontation, leading to widespread allegations of property damage and public disturbance.
Following the incident, police arrested several individuals associated with Singh, including Vijayprasad Dhanuk, Santoshkumar Rajbhar, and Dibyendu Samanta. However, Singh managed to avoid arrest, despite being the alleged mastermind behind the vandalism. His son, Shivam Singh, was arrested earlier this week for allegedly aiding his father’s escape. Police believe Shivam used his car to help his father flee the scene before law enforcement arrived.
Kolkata Police Joint Commissioner Rupesh Kumar confirmed Singh’s arrest, stating that a police team raided a flat in Tangra at around 2 a.m. on Tuesday after receiving a tip-off about his location. “Rakesh Singh, who had been at large for the past few days, was arrested during the raid. Police had been actively looking for him,” Kumar said.
Singh, who had remained active on social media, posted several videos during his time on the run, including one in which he threatened the police and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. In the video, Singh was seen hurling abuses at Kolkata Police Commissioner Manoj Verma, further intensifying the controversy surrounding his evasion.
The vandalism sparked outrage within the Congress party, with Bengal Congress President Subhankar Sarkar leading a protest in the form of a road blockade at Moulali Crossing. The Congress demanded the immediate arrest of all individuals involved in the attack on their headquarters, including Singh. “We will not tolerate such attacks on our party and leaders. The culprits must be brought to justice,” said Sarkar.
Following the raid and Singh’s arrest, the police have booked him for multiple charges, including vandalism and public mischief. He will be produced in court for police custody, where further investigation into the incident will take place.
The arrest of Rakesh Singh has sent ripples through Bengal’s political landscape, with both the BJP and Congress continuing to exchange barbs over the incident. The situation remains tense, with Singh’s supporters and detractors each rallying around the event, which has become a flashpoint in the ongoing political battle between the state’s major political parties.
As of now, the Kolkata Police are continuing their investigation, and more arrests could follow depending on the developments surrounding the case.
Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, September 4, 2025, Kolkata : In a significant development for the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in West Bengal, state president Shamik Bhattacharya has officially launched the ‘Karyakarta Darbar’ at the party’s historic headquarters at 6 Muralidhar Sen Lane. The initiative, designed to bridge the gap between the party leadership and its workers, is aimed at addressing the concerns of BJP members at the grassroots level.
The updated order, effective from September 2025, extends the deadline for persecuted minorities seeking refuge in India from these neighboring countries, allowing them to stay without valid documents. Initially, the CAA, which became law in 2019, applied to individuals who entered India by December 31, 2014, but the recent extension to December 31, 2024, addresses the ongoing influx of refugees fleeing religious persecution. This change offers a lifeline, particularly for many Hindus from Pakistan, who have been residing in India since 2015 but lacked the documentation to regularize their stay.
The amended law allows individuals from these minority communities who arrived in India without valid documents — or whose documents have expired — to apply for citizenship under the CAA. The key criteria for the exemption include being persecuted or fearing religious persecution in their countries of origin. The new measure addresses concerns from many who arrived post-2014 and had feared being left in legal limbo, particularly those unable to obtain or renew essential travel documents due to political instability or lack of consular support from their home countries.
In a significant shift from the original cut-off date of December 31, 2014, the MHA’s decision marks a decade-long extension. This move comes after appeals from various refugee organizations and minority rights bodies that argued the original deadline did not account for the continued migration of persecuted communities. Notably, Hindus from Pakistan have been among the most vocal in seeking this extension, given their precarious position in Pakistan’s religious landscape.
The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, passed by Parliament in 2019, sought to fast-track citizenship for non-Muslim refugees who had fled Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan to escape religious persecution. Under the CAA, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians were granted an expedited path to citizenship, but Muslims were notably excluded from the provision, sparking widespread debate and controversy.
The extension to December 31, 2024, also responds to the challenges posed by the ongoing refugee crisis. Cross-border migration, particularly in the context of religious persecution, has been a long-standing issue. Many of those seeking shelter in India did so with expired documents or without any formal travel papers. As a result, the MHA’s recent move to waive the requirement for valid documentation aims to address the humanitarian aspect of the crisis, providing much-needed clarity and protection for displaced individuals.
However, the CAA continues to face significant opposition, especially in India’s northeastern states, where the law has fueled fears of demographic change. Critics argue that the law’s exclusion of Muslims violates the secular principles enshrined in India’s Constitution. The law has been challenged in the Supreme Court for its constitutionality, with opponents claiming it discriminates against Muslims, including those who face religious persecution in the countries from which they are fleeing, such as the Ahmadiyyas and Shias in Pakistan and the Hazaras in Afghanistan.
Protests against the CAA erupted across India in 2019, with large demonstrations continuing in 2024 when the rules for implementing the law were finalized. Opposition parties and civil society groups have expressed concerns that the CAA, when coupled with the National Register of Citizens (NRC), could render Indian Muslims vulnerable to losing their citizenship status, while non-Muslims excluded from the NRC would be able to reclaim citizenship under the CAA.
The controversial nature of the law has also led to concerns regarding its impact on the Assam Accord of 1985, which set a cut-off date for detecting and deporting illegal immigrants in Assam, regardless of their religion. Critics argue that the CAA could undermine the Assam Accord, particularly in light of concerns that the law could bring large numbers of migrants to the region, changing its demographic composition.
In response to these concerns, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma stated that only three individuals in the state have been granted citizenship under the CAA so far, highlighting that the process is ongoing, with nine more applications under consideration. Sarma emphasized that the law, as it stands, would not be implemented indiscriminately, and applicants must go through a rigorous verification process.
While the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has defended the CAA, asserting that it provides shelter to persecuted minorities, the law remains highly contentious. Proponents of the Act argue that it is a necessary measure to protect the religious minorities facing persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh, countries where Islam is the state religion and religious minorities are often marginalized.
The CAA’s critics, however, point out that the law fails to address the plight of Muslim minorities in these countries, particularly the Shia, Ahmadiyya, and Hazaras in Pakistan, and the Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, who also face severe persecution. The exclusion of Muslims from the CAA has led to accusations of religious discrimination and a violation of India’s secular ethos.
The government, on its part, has stated that the CAA does not affect the citizenship of any Indian citizen and is solely intended to provide protection to religious minorities who have been persecuted for their faith. The MHA has clarified that the law’s provisions are designed to address the needs of communities facing genuine religious persecution, with a particular focus on minorities from neighboring Islamic-majority countries.
The implementation of the CAA, particularly in the context of the extended deadline and its implications for India’s demographic composition, continues to be a subject of intense debate. As the legal challenges against the law continue to unfold, the future of the CAA and its impact on India’s secular fabric remains uncertain. For now, the latest order from the Ministry of Home Affairs provides a crucial lifeline to many individuals who have sought refuge in India but were left without a clear path to citizenship.
The members of the naval, military, or air forces of India entering or exiting India on duty, along with the family members of any such person when accompanying them on a government transport, will also not be required to carry a passport or visa, according to an order issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) following the enforcement of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.
The requirement of a valid passport or other valid travel documents, and a valid visa for entry into, stay in, and exit from India shall not apply if “a citizen of India is entering India by land or air over the Nepalese or Bhutanese frontier, a citizen of Nepal or Bhutan is entering India by land or air over the Nepal or Bhutan border, or if they possess a valid passport while entering or exiting India from or to a place other than Nepal or Bhutan, but not from China, Macau, Hong Kong, or Pakistan,” the MHA said.
The provision is also applicable to Tibetans who have already entered India and are staying in the country, or entering India if they have registered with the registration officers concerned and obtained certificates of registration. This applies to those who entered India after 1959 but before May 30, 2003, on the Special Entry Permit issued by the Indian embassy in Kathmandu, or those who entered India after May 30, 2003, till the date of the Act coming into force, on the new Special Entry Permit issued by the Indian embassy in Kathmandu through the immigration post on the Indo-Nepal border, as designated by the Centre.
A person belonging to a minority community in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan — Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians — who were compelled to seek shelter in India due to religious persecution or fear of religious persecution, and entered the country on or before December 31, 2024, without valid documents, including a passport or other travel documents, or with valid documents, including a passport or other travel documents whose validity has expired, will be exempted from the rule of possessing a valid passport and visa.
The rule will also not apply to registered Sri Lankan Tamil nationals who took shelter in India by January 9, 2015.
Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, September 2, 2025, Kolkata : Abhishek Banerjee, the All India General Secretary of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), delivered a stern message of unity and cooperation to the leadership of the Ghatal organizational district of West Midnapore during a meeting in Kolkata on Monday. The meeting, held at Camac Street, came in the wake of internal disputes within the district leadership, particularly over the changes at the block level.
Present at the meeting were senior state ministers, including Manas Bhuiyan, Shiuli Saha, former minister Humayun Kabir, and Ajit Maiti, among other prominent leaders of the Ghatal district’s branch organizations. Abhishek Banerjee emphasized the importance of working cohesively to strengthen the party, particularly as leadership adjustments and changes at the block level are inevitable.
The main point of contention in the district is the ongoing dispute between key leaders, specifically Radhakant Maiti, the current chairperson of Ghatal, and Humayun Kabir, the current MLA of Debra. The tension between the two stems from their differing approaches to leadership at the block level. Radhakant, who was previously the MLA of Debra, has clashed with Humayun, and their relationship has been described as strained. The leaders’ disagreements have become particularly evident in the ongoing changes to the leadership in the blocks of Debra, Pingla, and Keshpur.
Moreover, Shiuli Saha, another influential leader from the district, has faced opposition from a section of the district over leadership changes in Keshpur. These internal conflicts have created a rift within the Ghatal organizational district, hindering the party’s unity and progress in the region.
According to several leaders present at the meeting, Abhishek Banerjee addressed these concerns directly. He acknowledged the differing proposals from the district’s leadership, including suggestions from Radhakant, Shiuli, Humayun, and Ajit. However, he made it clear that while these proposals would be considered, the final decision regarding leadership changes and organizational matters would rest with party leader Mamata Banerjee.
Abhishek’s call for unity was not just a directive but a firm reminder that the TMC must move forward together. “In the coming days, everyone, including Mamata Banerjee, will have to accept the necessary changes made at the block level. The party’s future depends on collective efforts and working together,” Abhishek asserted during the meeting.
The tensions within the Ghatal district are part of broader discussions around party unity and leadership restructuring within the TMC. With the party facing challenges in maintaining cohesion, Abhishek’s message was seen as a clear indication that internal conflicts must be resolved swiftly and with the party’s broader goals in mind.
As the party moves forward, the hope is that these internal disputes will be resolved and the leadership can unite to focus on the larger objective of strengthening the Trinamool Congress in West Bengal.
Although the state BJP leadership, including figures like State President Shamik Bhattacharya, share a consensus on Ghosh’s value, it is ultimately the central leadership in Delhi that will determine his future role. The ongoing question in political circles is whether Delhi will re-appoint the former state president to the state committee or assign him to another crucial post.
In a recent meeting at the state BJP office in Salt Lake, Ghosh, in his signature candid style, declared that despite lacking an official party position and facing the impending end of his tenure as MP in 2024, he still maintains his relevance in Bengal’s political arena. “I still have a price in the market,” Ghosh remarked, signaling that he has not been sidelined completely, despite his diminishing visibility. His consistent assertion that he has not lost his relevance in the state speaks volumes about his self-assuredness and potential political maneuvering.
However, the critical question remains: Is Dilip Ghosh about to receive a new political responsibility? Will the party grant him a place back in the central or state committee? Responding to this uncertainty in the past, Ghosh stated, “Let’s see how the party wants. I have previously contested in the assembly and Lok Sabha, and I will do whatever is needed for the party’s needs.” His willingness to adapt to the party’s demands suggests that Ghosh is keeping his options open, awaiting a potential political reshuffle.
The political dynamics within the state BJP have certainly shifted since Shamik Bhattacharya assumed the role of state president. Bhattacharya’s leadership has elevated the importance of veteran party members, and one of his clear objectives is to integrate long-serving workers back into the party’s fold. Given this context, it is highly possible that Ghosh, as a prominent leader with years of experience, could be reintroduced into the political fold.
As one of the party’s strongest and most influential leaders in Bengal, Dilip Ghosh’s political trajectory is far from over. With the next assembly elections on the horizon, many are watching closely to see whether Ghosh will once again be at the forefront of West Bengal BJP’s political strategy. The coming months will likely reveal whether Ghosh’s political influence will be revived or if he will continue to play a more diminished role in state politics.
The controversy erupted on Friday when Rakesh Singh and his supporters were seen engaging in a violent attack on the Pradesh Congress office, setting fire to photographs of Congress leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, and burning the party’s flags. The event has sparked widespread backlash, with critics accusing Singh of crossing a line that could damage the BJP’s public image. However, the most significant fallout appears to be within the party itself.
As the incident gained attention, the state BJP, under pressure from various quarters, distanced itself from Singh. State President Shamik Bhattacharya, who had been under political pressure, condemned the actions, making it clear that the BJP does not support the burning of any political party’s flag. “This was not an approved program of the party,” Bhattacharya asserted, signaling his firm stance against the attack.
Meanwhile, Shuvendu Adhikari, who has often been seen as a guiding force for Rakesh Singh within the BJP, also distanced himself from the controversy. In his response, Adhikari confirmed that Singh is a BJP member but made it clear that the party does not condone his actions. “I support what our state president Shamik Bhattacharya has said about this incident. This was not an approved program of the party,” Adhikari stated, further signaling his discomfort with Singh’s actions.
The growing tension between Rakesh Singh and key BJP leaders has underscored the factional struggles within the state unit of the party. Singh’s close ties to Shuvendu Adhikari have long been noted in political circles, and his sudden isolation raises questions about internal power dynamics within the Bengal BJP. The lack of support from both Adhikari and Bhattacharya highlights the deepening divide among party leaders, especially as the state prepares for the upcoming elections.
Rakesh Singh, who was once seen as an influential figure in the party, now faces a precarious position. His political future seems uncertain as he finds himself increasingly isolated, with his recent actions seemingly out of step with the party’s official stance. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether Singh will be able to mend his relationship with the party leadership or if this marks the beginning of his political decline within the BJP.
The modernized library, a reflection of cutting-edge infrastructure and educational innovation, was established under the guidance of Sudhir Kumar Mehta, a prominent alumnus of the school and a senior advocate at the Calcutta High Court. This initiative was undertaken in honor of his late father, Madan Kumar Mehta, a founding member of Shree Jain Vidyalaya, whose legacy continues to inspire the institution.
The official inauguration ceremony took place on Sunday, with Justice (Retd.) Ashok Kumar Ganguly, former Judge of the Supreme Court and former Chairman of the West Bengal Human Rights Commission, as the chief guest. Also present at the event were Shanta Kumari Mehta, wife of the late Madan Kumar Mehta, distinguished physician Dr. Amit Kumar Roy, and prominent school leaders including Vinod Kankaria and Sardar Mal Kankaria, as well as Principal Sanjay Kumar Pandey and Secretary Manoj Kumar Bothra.
In his inaugural address, Justice Ganguly underscored the crucial role of education in societal progress, stating, “Without education, the advancement of society is not possible. This initiative will guide the next generation on the right path.”
Sudhir Kumar Mehta shared his vision for the new library, emphasizing its role as a center for innovation and research. Equipped with state-of-the-art digital learning facilities, the library offers students access to online resources, e-journals, and academic databases. This transformation will significantly aid students in preparing for higher education, competitive exams, and research, providing them with the tools needed to thrive in an increasingly digital world.
The establishment of this library represents more than just the development of physical infrastructure—it is a lasting contribution to knowledge and intellectual growth. By offering access to a wide range of educational tools and fostering a culture of innovation, the Madan Kumar Mehta Memorial Library is poised to open new avenues of learning, creativity, and research for the students of Shree Jain Vidyalaya.
Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, Aug 30 2025, Kolkata : Every Saturday, the Phulbari border between India and Bangladesh witnesses a poignant display of friendship and cooperation between the Border Security Force (BSF) of India and the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB). At the Zero Point of the border, the two countries’ national flags are hoisted in a ceremony that symbolizes the once-strong bond between the two nations. This border, once bustling with trade and commercial exchanges, now stands as a reminder of the shifts in geopolitical and economic ties.
Amid a record-breaking turnout, Abhishek described the crowd as “historic,” asserting that the TMCP had shattered all previous attendance records. “The kind of passion and unity we saw today proves that the BJP doesn’t stand a chance—not even against TMCP, let alone against our senior leaders or block presidents,” he said.
Taking a direct dig at a BJP rally held earlier this month at the same venue, he remarked, “Whether it was a rally or a circus on August 11, it was hard to differentiate.” His comments drew loud cheers from students gathered at the site.
Reinforcing Trinamool’s criticism of the Centre, Abhishek revisited the pending RG case and asked why the Aparajita Bill still hasn’t been passed. “Why is this delay happening? Who is blocking justice? These questions must be answered,” he demanded from the stage, suggesting systemic delays and discrimination.
Abhishek also lauded the Trinamool government for settling pending dues of 69 lakh job card holders in the state, calling it a significant milestone that reflects the state’s commitment to the underprivileged and working class. “If we can fight and win for these 69 lakh, we can fight for the 10 crore Bengalis being insulted every day,” he asserted.
In a strong cultural and political rebuttal to recurring narratives targeting Bengalis, he criticized those who label people from the state as “Bangladeshis” or question the legitimacy of the Bengali language. “We will answer those who dare to say that Bengali is not a language,” he thundered, rallying students to rise against such divisive propaganda.
The TMCP rally became a launching pad for Abhishek Banerjee to energize the party’s youth base while issuing strong warnings to political rivals. With growing prominence in the party’s leadership structure, his speech reflected a fusion of assertive politics, generational change, and continuity in the party’s core message.
Baby Chakraborty, KalimNews, Aug 29 2025, Kolkata : At the massive Trinamool Chhatra Parishad (TMCP) Foundation Day rally held today at Mayo Road, West Bengal Chief Minister and Trinamool Congress Chairperson Mamata Banerjee delivered a fiery and emotional speech, touching upon her personal political struggles, institutional challenges, and Bengal’s development milestones.
Addressing a sea of supporters, Mamata Banerjee launched a direct attack on the Election Commission, accusing it of partisan behaviour. She alleged that forces she called “high-voltage viruses” were “violently withholding funds” and working in collaboration with what she termed “SIR” to strip citizens of their voting rights. “It is unfortunate that the Election Commission is playing someone’s lollipop,” she said, criticising what she sees as politically motivated targeting of migrant workers and voters.
Mamata Banerjee drew a sharp contrast between her government’s treatment of migrant labourers and that of others. “They call 22 lakh migrant workers names and torture them. But here in Bengal, we support 1.5 crore migrant workers and provide them with dignity and jobs,” she asserted, adding that under her leadership, the state had created employment for 2 crore individuals.
Revisiting her early political activism, Banerjee shared a chilling account of a near-death experience during a college election in Kolkata. She recalled how Communist Party goons allegedly abducted two boys during her speech at Ashutosh College. “I went to drink water and saw them taking the boys away. I grabbed one by the collar, but they chased me with a pipe gun,” she recounted. She described how local shopkeepers from a nearby restaurant, Srihari Mishtanna Bhandar, sheltered her. “Had they not hidden me, I wouldn’t have survived that day,” she said, visibly emotional.
Amid the political commentary, Banerjee also underscored the strides made by her administration in education. “We have spent ₹69,000 crore on building Bengal’s educational infrastructure. Kanyashree has won the highest international awards,” she stated, proudly claiming that her government’s initiatives under the leadership of Subrata Bakshi have transformed the state’s educational landscape.
She concluded by reaffirming her deep-rooted connection with the people of Bengal, saying, “My Bengali land is the best of all states. I have travelled the world, but no one knows this country better than I do.”
The rally, marking TMCP’s foundation day, served as more than just a student gathering — it became a platform for Mamata Banerjee to reassert her leadership, defend the values of her government, and issue a sharp critique of her political opponents and federal institutions.
The deceased has been identified as Tapan Mondal, a resident of Joynagar in South 24 Parganas, who worked as a lorry driver. According to eyewitness accounts, the accident occurred at approximately 9 a.m.
Sources revealed that a lorry carrying paddy was traveling from Medinipur to Badulia. At a junction in East Burdwan, driver Tapan Mondal alighted from the vehicle and proceeded toward Badulia on a motorbike belonging to the lorry driver. While on his way near Badulia, his motorcycle collided with the large front wheel of a brick-laden tractor that was en route to Sehara Bazar from Radha Bazar.
The impact was severe, and Tapan Mondal sustained fatal head injuries, resulting in his death at the scene. Eyewitnesses suggested that the collision occurred due to negligence on the part of the tractor driver.
Following the incident, personnel from the Seharabazar police outpost, Khandaghosh Police Station, and the traffic department rushed to the location. Authorities confirmed that the tractor involved in the crash has been seized. However, the driver fled the scene and remains untraceable.
Police have launched an investigation into the accident and efforts are underway to locate the absconding tractor driver.